.
Feedback

Parents Talk: Ban Candy on Valentine's Day?

Some schools are keeping sweets out of the classroom.

What's Valentine's Day without candy?

Some kids are finding out, as schools extend bans on classroom sweets to holiday celebrations out of concern for students' health.

A Massachusetts school's has drawn national and international attention and criticism, as well as praise.

Parents in Minneapolis, where a policy to promote better student health started last year, see messages like:

"Students can bring valentines, but as you are shopping for valentines, please DO NOT purchase valentines with candy or send candy to school for the party."

Our 11-year-old broke the news to me a few days ago: The general ban on sugary snacks at her school applies to Valentine's Day. "It's ridiculous," she said. "Fruit snacks are about as close as you can get."

That sent her brother, 17, into a reverie about what used to be—candy hearts, pixie sticks, Hershey's bars. Sweets, he remembered, were "the whole point. It's small candy but it adds up. We had pretty big class sizes."

Our daughter explained that from a kid's perspective, Valentine's Day is the one holiday celebrated more at school than it is at home. "It's really fun," she said, lapsing into the present tense. "It's just 45 minutes of walking around and eating candy."

She'll still get a list of kids in her class and spend the weekend cutting out hearts or shopping for paper cards. And my wife gets the kids small boxes of chocolates—a tradition firmly instituted one year when they wondered why only we parents were exchanging heart-shaped presents at home.

So Valentine's Day will survive. But it won't be the same.

In fact, said my daughter, "It's absolutely horrible."

Ann Landon February 9, 2012 at 02:22 pm
I've seen too many kids with diabetes by middle school or are too big to fit into a standard desk to give kids candy any more. It may seem like just one day, but we have this same discussion around Christmas, and class parties, and student birthdays, and Halloween, and Pi Day, and 100th day, and on and on... The fact that we cannot conceive of a celebration without unhealthy food is the reason we have an enormous weight problem in this country. I've seen teachers have big fun in their classrooms without candy. Extra recess, games, songs, art projects, free time, movies, joke time - those make parties fun too. Remember, kids aren't losing a tradition when we take away the treats - they don't have traditions in school yet. The adults have way more problems with taking away the candy than the kids do.
Caitlin Burgess (Editor) February 9, 2012 at 04:31 pm
While I think it's important that healthy eating habits are enforced in schools, I think with anything, it needs to be reinforced at home, too. Childhood obesity is becoming a growing problem, but why is that? Kids in general aren't eating as healthy as in the past. Maybe stopping the candy train at school will help, but I think parents are mostly responsible. Two cents.
Jon McCullough February 9, 2012 at 05:29 pm
Big brother is bloated enough, why let him stop the little guy from having a piece of candy? I'll tell ya why, because big brother doesn't feel like he has enough power! BTW - if you didn't get it, big brother are the idiots we've voted in that continue to grow government out of control and dictate what we eat. Dood, if someone is going to get their kid fat there is nothing you can do to stop them short of taking their parenting license away... ohh crap, now I gave big brother ideas...!
Clare Kennedy (Editor) February 9, 2012 at 05:37 pm
Wow, Ann, that is illuminating. I can definitely see where this comes from though. It seems like at every possible occasion Americans celebrate by eating something.
Christine Petersen February 9, 2012 at 05:54 pm
Hopkins School District has an award-winning school lunch program. Unhealthy treats in the classroom work at odds to that goal. They also defeat efforts from home to promote fitness and sustainability. I think it's lovely for my son to get cards from his friends at school, and even to get a sweet treat from his family. But the emphasis on candy in classroom Valentine's Day parties distorts the meaning of the holiday. Junk food is not love, and it has nothing to do with learning.
Christine Petersen February 9, 2012 at 05:56 pm
Great reminders here, Ann.
Michael Rose February 9, 2012 at 06:09 pm
I don't have any kids myself, so I can't speak from a parent's perspective, but I do think "sweets" are OK for kids in school on V-Day—in moderation. Maybe teachers can tell the kids not to bring candy, but they'll bring some themselves and control the amount handed out. I think the answer to these sorts of questions is rarely a blanket ban. Kids are kids, and they'll eat candy. But adults can set good examples for how much is consumed.
PS - Not sure about all this obesity talk being relevant. A lot of V-Day candy is fat free. High in sugar? Of course. But I don't think V-Day candy hearts and the like necessarily contribute to an obesity epidemic. There are other gatherings (i.e. Super Bowl parties) that have much fattier foods.
rob_h78 February 9, 2012 at 08:23 pm
If it was just Valentine's Day and other specific times that kids were ingesting large amounts of sugar that would be fine - but given that unfortunately far too many kids ingest large amounts of sugar each day - coupled with little real physical activity, I don't think that we need to have it in school also - even for Valentine's Day.
How about instead schools can take the opportunity to have some healthy treats - fruit, etc... and maybe kids can see that they don't have to have Candy at every possible opportunity. When I pick my grade school child up, it is pretty shocking how many (sorry to say it) fat and really fat kids there are in grade school. I dug out my old grade school class photos and we all looked like "famine" victims compared to what I too often see when I pick my child up.
Michael Rose February 9, 2012 at 08:37 pm
That's not a bad idea, Rob. For kids, it's human nature to see something tasty as a reward, and on occasions like V-Day, such a reward seems appropriate. But if we can make the tasty treat more healthy, then that's a win-win. Maybe teachers can make fun, healthier treats with their students? I remember always enjoying "ants on a log" (celery, with peanut butter and raisins), and it could be a fun activity for the group.
rob_h78 February 9, 2012 at 08:41 pm
Unfortunately your conclusion is correct. And unfortunately for all us we get to pay the higher Health Care Costs on our insurance plans, medicare payments, et al...
margaret richardson February 9, 2012 at 08:49 pm
Michael, contrary to popular belief, fat is not what makes you fat. In the 1990's we say the rise of this nutritional theory. The processed food makers hit us with Snackwells and other low fat products. Most products were loaded with high fructose corn syrup and salt to make them palatable after having taken out the fat. If you look at the rise of the obesity epidemic, it correlates pretty well. Unfortunately, most mass produced candy is made with high fructose corn syrup, not cane sugar. (google, 'Sugar, the Bitter Truth' for a better understanding of how it is processed in the body.
Patterning our children's brains to link sweet with happy is not a good idea for future health.
Michael Rose February 9, 2012 at 08:53 pm
Thanks for the information, Margaret. Guess I just assumed that fat=fat, but it's interesting to know that there's more to it than that.
Kaija Prohofsky February 10, 2012 at 06:11 am
So ban Valentines.. and lets bring this up again in October for Halloween. Why not. Ugh. It gets old. There is way more to it than just a few days out of the year.
Plus, I really think the parents that freak out about sugar in kids, usually are feeding THEIR kids well.. (You know, a fairly healthy..balanced diet with fruit and veggies and proteins) So why not let them have a sweet treat or five or ten at school? The parents that don't supervise their kids sugar intake or 'let them' have large amounts of candy or whatever all the time, probably don't even think about valentines day as a big deal. But at the same time, they probably don't feed themselves well so why would they feed their kids any better? I guess what I am trying to say is, you are the parent. If you educate your kid about food and feed them the right things, Valentines/Halloween isn't going to make your kid gain 20 lbs overnight. And if you REALLY don't want your kid to participate, pull them out of school. It's been a few years since I have been in the school district, but it was crazy to see how many parents would pull their kids out of school for vacations (before spring break). If candy is really such a big deal, just skip the day and tell them how much you love them instead. :p
Kaija Prohofsky February 10, 2012 at 06:17 am
I am double posting too because my rant got a little long. :) As far as I remember, Teachers are not allowed to just make fun snacks for their kids. A kid with allergies and an unknowing teacher can be a bad problem..
I don't think this is new? I started at Highlands 15 years ago and there were strict rules in place regarding bringing in food.. for teachers and parents. No homemade food was allowed, basically everything had to be prepackaged and store bought. (If it was to be shared with the class of course) Personal food and snack obviously is different.
Chris Steller (Editor) February 10, 2012 at 10:50 am
Kaija, thanks for the comments. It does seem that closer attention to food in the classroom goes back at least a decade or two. For my kids, though, the strict rule on no sweets for Halloween is new this year.
Bill Levine February 10, 2012 at 11:28 am
Teaching kids healthy eating habits is the key. Like the forbidden fruit...if we do not teach our children what should be the basis of a healthy lifestyle..they will later on gravitate towards the bad stuff. In total moderation an occasional treat is ok. Let us fill up with fruits..veggies..and whole grains. Afterwards..a small dark chocolate. Good antioxidants. Good nutrtrition starts at home with modeling and smart choices. Oh...how about healthy school lunch programs? That would be something to rally around.
charles spolyar February 10, 2012 at 05:03 pm
Back in my days of grade school in the 70's I don't remember exchanging candy as part of Valentines day. Cards, yes, but not candy. Any one else have the smae recollection?
Chris Steller (Editor) February 10, 2012 at 05:08 pm
Charles, good point. I think the Golden Era of School Valentine's Day with Candy was maybe 1988-2012.
Michael Rose February 10, 2012 at 05:13 pm
Chris, you're probably right. I'm a youngster, and during my grade school days in the '90s, there was often candy attached to some of the Valentines. Not all of them, but some kids did. Things like suckers and candy hearts, mainly.
Cedar Phillips February 12, 2012 at 04:12 am
It's one day a year. No one is going to get fat from eating a handful of candy hearts. If anything, sending the message that candy is for special treats (and therefore NOT a normal daily event) seems to the better message here. I have fond memories from my own MPS Valentine's Day parties (back in the '80s), and those memories most definitely include candy hearts. (I think heart-shaped lollipops were also common, but the hearts seemed to be more common) And what about literacy? Don't you remember reading the messages on the hearts before eating them? I still do, and enjoy seeing how they've changed over the years. And while yes, of course it's a stretch to suggest that exchanging conversation hearts promotes childhood literacy, I think it's also a stretch to suggest that popping a handful of sugar on February 14th is contributing to our childhood obesity epidemic. Focusing on holiday candy policies distracts from the larger issues here.
Christine Petersen February 12, 2012 at 02:07 pm
I don't worry about the fact that my child has a few treats at school at the time of his class's Valentine's Day party. The problem is that Valentine's Day has turned into another Halloween. The tradition has always been to give each classmate a card. Now, at least half of the cards my son brings home have lollipops and other candy attached. That's at least two week's worth of candy--a big impact, not an isolated incident.
The point of a party is to reinforce class community, and candy really doesn't have to be a part of that.
margaret richardson February 12, 2012 at 02:22 pm
i believe the issue is just highlighted on Valentine's Day. Throughout the whole school year, in my niece's 2nd grade classroom, candy or sweets are used to celebrate everything. When they finished the geology study, the teacher had them create "dirt" chocolate pudding, ground oreo cookie topping and gummy worms. Kids are given jolly rancher candy when they do well on a math sheet. Gingerbread houses for winter break. When they kids had a scheduled release day, they made necklaces out of fruit loops. When the kids get a little distracted in the classroom, the teacher hands out a jolly rancher rather than have them do something active the refresh their brains. Not only is it the pattern of giving candy/snacks to reward something, but the message than you need to turn to a sugary, dye laden candy when you are feeling distracted, tired...I think is a really, really bad message. (Google the relationship of food dye to ADD/ADHD behavior) AND this is the year they are supposed to be learning about nutrition! Talk about a disconnect.
Beth K. February 13, 2012 at 09:57 pm
How many schools allow Valentine's Day to be acknowledged at all? At Emmet D. Williams Elementary, a Roseville, MN ISD623 school, Valentine's Day has been banned in its entirety. There will be no cards. No candy. And definitely NO party. They say it’s an equity issue. Instead of a party, they will talk to the kids about “what it means to be a friend.”
For some of the children, it was their favorite party. Not all kids gave candy. Many just gave cards (the best were homemade). Some added a pencil or tattoo. Our Valentine's Day parties were led by parents, funded by parents and the PTA. It was a wonderful way for parents to meet other parents, working together to plan and run the parties. The kids LOVED these parties. As far as the obesity epidemic, it’s not caused by the kids having a treat at school. It’s the day-to-day lousy eating habits many people now have. Fast food too often, white bread, white rice, pre-packaged foods, etc. If anything at school contributes to it, it would be the horrendous school lunches and the cuts to Phy Ed.
Cedar Phillips February 14, 2012 at 04:40 am
That has been the case for centuries, though; food has ALWAYS been at the center of celebrations (and not just in the United States). Americans didn't suddenly become fat because they incorporated food into their communal celebrations. There are many different theories as to the reasons for the growing obesity epidemic, but no one gets fat on special holiday treats. That said, I DO think that candy in the classroom should be limited to special events, not casually tossed around or given as rewards as is the case in some classrooms. I am in full support of encouraging healthy eating, but do think focusing on the supposed dangers of classroom holiday parties distracts from larger conversations.
Renee E Walker February 14, 2012 at 04:03 pm
I really like your idea Beth=0)I just want to add that the teachers and school`s really do teach our kid`s good nutrition,but they also teach them what it means to be responsible.Learning responsibility come`s primarily from mom and dad.I don`t as a parent believe it`s a good idea to blame things on other people it`s teaching kid`s to become hostile,I try and teach my kids to take responsibility for their actions and they learn not only through their mistakes but mine as well.If I do something wrong I own up to it,they look up to me in a better way as well as other adults,they are also learning a very good lesson in life.Diabetes is based on upon a persons choice,if not that then it`s genetics (though i`m not a doctor) I believe with all my heart it`s the decisions we make.All parent`s do their best,and are mostly great caring people who want the best for their child,but just think about what I wrote and keep taking care of those kiddo`s the best you can.=0)
rob_h78 February 14, 2012 at 04:09 pm
I don't recall candy either being in school other than what kids brought in their lunches and even then most kids who brought their lunches had real sandwiches (tuna, PBJ, ham, etc...) and, yes, actual "fruit" and stuff like real carrots and as I recall there wasn't a lot of processed junk as there is today.
Janine February 14, 2012 at 05:48 pm
I also have a child at Emmet D. Williams Elementary School in Roseville and I would have had no problem if the school district would have just banned the candy for Valentine's Day and kept the Valentine's and school party. Instead, the district not only banned Valentine's Day but ALL holiday celebrations throughout all schools in the district. Can't even mention the word, Halloween anymore. Absolutely ridiculous! U.S. traditional values and respect for our heritage have gone down the drain. Morale is down by all the kids at Emmet D. and so has our school ranking, plummeting from 2nd to last place. I miss our hold principal who valued parents' opinions. ! I think it's time for a new Superintendent.
Chris Steller (Editor) February 14, 2012 at 06:27 pm
Really interesting about what's going on in Roseville. Valentine's parties aren't banned at my daughter's school but in her classroom anyway, the candy ban has had the same effect. There is no Valentine's party, and as you say it was one of the kids' favorite days at school. Maybe the parents could have rescued the party. I wish I'd learned about the problem earlier.
Penna1965 February 27, 2012 at 04:44 pm
Kids are not exercising either. Sitting still, watching television, watching movies, sitting in a car, not playing sports because the sports are too organized, playing video games, etc. There are not pickup games at the park, hardly any kids playing outside. Exercise and diet go hand in hand. In Minnesota, PE classes are only once in high school, not every year daily or three times a week when my husband and I were in school.
Penna1965 February 27, 2012 at 04:50 pm
Margaret, high fructose corn syrup is just as bad as beet sugar or cane sugar. Sugar is sugar no matter the source. Limiting the sugar in everything is key. Moderation, exercise and diet.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Fridley Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Mike B. June 17, 2013 at 03:56 pm
Sad to say, the Minnesota budget will drive more Minnesota families and businesses out of thisRead More state. The Democrat Party has enacted a far-left wing agenda. New business start-ups in Minnesota continue to decline. Why should a business invest in a state with confiscatory taxes? Wisconsin and the Dakotas, with excellent Republican governors are attracting business and top-flight workers, while Minnesota stagnates at best.
Fridley Parks & Recreation June 9, 2013 at 06:56 am
For complete rules on how to participate visit the City's web site:Read More http://ci.fridley.mn.us/images/article-files/parksandrec/49erdays/Fridley_Idol_Rules.pdf
Fridley Parks & Recreation June 9, 2013 at 07:01 am
For rules and detailed information on the contest visit the City's web site:Read More http://ci.fridley.mn.us/49er-days/fridley-idol
Dan Johnson June 12, 2013 at 05:50 pm
Candace. Religious groups currently perform same sex marriages, as they have in the past. RequiringRead More a religious ceremony for a marriage does not solve your problem of same sex marriages. It only denies marriage to non-believers. And would you include every religion? Or just those of which you approve? Same sex marriage is nothing new. Despite your lack of information, same sex couples have been getting married throughout history, and marriage has taken many other forms as well in addition to the 8 types found in the bible. Dire predictions of collapse do not show how treating all persons equally under the law results in the loss of freedom rather than the expansion of it.
Dan Johnson June 12, 2013 at 06:14 pm
Donald. We can agree on liking better, the old format that allows direct replies. Strange youRead More would accuse Mike H. of seeking a utopia, and then describe your childhood experience where all conflicts are successfully resolved by the parties involved, without the help of adult intervention. Most of us lived in a very different reality, where bullies were often tolerated if not encouraged by many adults, and some kids suffer severe harm which results in suicide for more than a few. While I don't support "zero tolerance" laws or policies that expel all kids who are involved in a physical altercation, I support adult intervention in all such events. They should be used to teach civilized conflict resolution, anger management, and assess the need for any other intervention. Kids who bully are often learning it at home through being abused. Did you skip reading "Lord of the Flies"?
Dan Johnson June 12, 2013 at 06:25 pm
I also miss paragraphs.
Dan Johnson June 4, 2013 at 06:10 pm
American Academy of Pediatrics: "The terms reparative therapy and sexual orientation conversionRead More therapy refer to counseling and psychotherapy aimed at eliminating or suppressing homosexuality. The most important fact about these “therapies” is that they are based on a view of homosexuality that has been rejected by all the major mental health professions. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders,6 published by the American Psychiatric Association, which defines the standards of the field, does not include homosexuality. All other major health professional organizations have supported the American Psychiatric Association in its declassification of homosexuality as a mental disorder in 1973. Thus, the idea that homosexuality is a mental disorder or that the emergence of same-sex attraction and orientation among some adolescents is in any way abnormal or mentally unhealthy has no support among any mainstream health and mental health professional organizations. The idea that homosexuality is a mental disorder or that the emergence of same-sex attraction and orientation among some adolescents is in any way abnormal or mentally unhealthy has no support among any mainstream health and mental health professional organizations."
Dan Johnson June 4, 2013 at 06:12 pm
"Despite the general consensus of major medical, health, and mental health professions thatRead More both heterosexuality and homosexuality are normal expressions of human sexuality, efforts to change sexual orientation through therapy have been adopted by some political and religious organizations and aggressively promoted to the public. However, such efforts have serious potential to harm young people because they present the view that the sexual orientation of lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth is a mental illness or disorder, and they often frame the inability to change one’s sexual orientation as a personal and moral failure. Because of the aggressive promotion of efforts to change sexual orientation through therapy, a number of medical, health, and mental health professional organizations have issued public statements about the dangers of this approach. The American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Counseling Association, the American Psychiatric Association, the American Psychological Association, the American School Counselor Association, the National Association of School Psychologists, and the National Association of Social Workers, together representing more than 480,000 mental health professionals, have all taken the position that homosexuality is not a mental disorder and thus is not something that needs to or can be “cured.” The American Academy of Pediatrics advises youth that counseling may be helpful for you if you feel confused about your sexual identity. Avoid any treatments that claim to be able to change a person’s sexual orientation, or treatment ideas that see homosexuality as a sickness." AAP
Dan Johnson June 4, 2013 at 06:31 pm
Ironically, much of the research showing orientation is not a choice, comes from failed efforts toRead More change it. Not only have such efforts shown efforts to change orientation are not successful, but that they are often harmful to the point of self destructive behavior including suicide. "Contrary to claims of sexual orientation change advocates and practitioners, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of psychological interventions to change sexual orientation," said Judith M. Glassgold, PsyD, chair of the task force. "Scientifically rigorous older studies in this area found that sexual orientation was unlikely to change due to efforts designed for this purpose. Contrary to the claims of SOCE practitioners and advocates, recent research studies do not provide evidence of sexual orientation change as the research methods are inadequate to determine the effectiveness of these interventions." Glassgold added: "At most, certain studies suggested that some individuals learned how to ignore or not act on their homosexual attractions. Yet, these studies did not indicate for whom this was possible, how long it lasted or its long-term mental health effects. Also, this result was much less likely to be true for people who started out only attracted to people of the same sex." APA Based on this review, the task force recommended that mental health professionals avoid misrepresenting the efficacy of sexual orientation change efforts when providing assistance to people distressed about their own or others' sexual orientation."
Tom May 31, 2013 at 12:20 pm
As I said earlier " if all goes well we will end the 49er days festival with fireworks onRead More Sunday, June 30th" Unfortunately all did not go well and we will not be able to have the fireworks this year. It takes a lot of donations to run a festival this large, so maybe if we get an early start for next year we will end the 2014 49er Day's Festival with a bang. Also we still could use some volunteers to help at tome of the functions during the festival. If you are able to volunteer, call Tom Bourque at 603-548-3958
David F May 3, 2013 at 03:02 am
We (parents) have created the hyper competitiveness of amateur sports. Pressure on coaches is aboutRead More winning, not too many coaches get fired who win state championships. . The measure that USA Hockey uses to assess the advancement of skill levels of US players is how many reach the NHL. The state legislature is trying to solve a problem even though they cannot define what the problem is.
J Johnson May 9, 2013 at 10:52 pm
The writer of this bill, Dean Urdahl, has gone on the record that NO coach has ever lost his job inRead More Minnesota based only on parent complaints - so why all the fuss and sense of need to do something? What Leah seems to think is the opinion of many parents and she is very wrong. Hasn't everyone read the news reports of coaches who abuse players, who steal from the school district, who are horrible with kids, who choose teams based on which parents will contribute $ to the program? This ILLEGAL behavior routinely happens in practically every school district. This legislation is a shield for bad coaches. Never heard of a good coach, who treats players with respect and who works on skill improvement in positive ways ever being let go. School districts and bad coaches put duct tape over their mouths to avoid the scandal that would result if the community knew what was happening on some high school teams. AD's, principals and school boards already have plenty of policies in place that make it almost impossible to fire employees - why do coaches need more protection than the lunch ladies, custodians, aides, teachers and support staff? The answer is they don't and this whole thing is a ploy to keep the good old boys network of bad coaches in their positions.
Orono May 20, 2013 at 06:06 pm
My son attends a school with the opposite situation. He attends a private school, competion toRead More attract new students can get severe. His school has gotten caught up in the desire to be a player in the sports arena in an effort to gain more students. While I admire the desire to become more competitive, when you dont have enough kids to field a football team, being competitve shouldnt be your first priority. The school has recently gone away from teachers being coaches to hiring outside the school. They recently hired a baseball coach that used to play professionally. When he is not coaching highschool, he runs a baseball academy. He cant live off only his coaching salary. His baseball academy is his bread and butter. It costs about $4000 to attend this academy. Half the academy was made up of his own highschool players. The players that paid the money and attended the academy played all the innings during the highschool season. The school was left with a huge black eye and was forced to replace him. The school has a senior class of only 70 kids (boys and girls) to begin with. It seems the math teacher who used to coach the team didnt have a sexy enough resume to attract outside students. The fiasco caused many average kids who couldnt afford the academy to quit. Now the school has even fewer kids playing and is forced to play underclassmen at the varsity level to fill the roster. Making a bad team even worse.
Russell Jones April 26, 2013 at 03:13 am
I agree with Ms. Powell, the cops have encrypted frequencies they can use that aren't available toRead More scanners. If the cops don't use them it's their mistake. The majority of communication should be allowed since law enforcement is paid for by our tax dollars making it publicly owned. The people have a right to know what their government is doing!
Penny May 18, 2013 at 05:25 am
Explore the latest women's bag collections exclusively available atRead More http://pinterest.com/louisvuittonlv/. Louis Vuitton Spring Summer 2013 Show your fashion style now!
Michael Hindin May 23, 2013 at 04:45 pm
Private channels are often difficult to arrange when you have multiple agencies involved. In thisRead More area there has been much progress in having compatible communication between different emergency responders. Cell phones help when time is not an issue.