.
Feedback

Inside the Million Dollar Keith Ellison Money Machine

Keith Ellison wants you to believe he wants to get money out of politics. Let's take a look at Keith's Million Dollar Money Machine, and examine what Keith actually does vs. what he says.

It’s a time-honored tradition in Washington—when people are focused on a problem that you don’t want them focused on, create a distraction. Today, people are concerned about job creation, the economy and the national debt. So obviously Keith Ellison is talking about… “”.

I get it. It’s a slick move on his part. Try and focus attention on something that sounds sexy—everyone hates "big money," right?

Keith Ellison knows that he is vulnerable on the issues that really matter, so he wants to create a distraction. He doesn’t want you thinking about the dismal job numbers, or the unemployment gap between whites and minorities in the Fifth District.

I’d rather we focus on the issues that matter to everyday citizens, but let’s indulge Keith for a minute and look at the issue of money in politics by examining the Ellison political campaign money operation.

Here are the facts:

  • Keith Ellison has raised and spent over one million dollars so far on this campaign.
  • More than 80% of Keith’s money comes from outside of the Fifth Congressional District.
  • Political Action Committees, many of which are funded by “big corporations,” have given Keith over $200,000 this election cycle, and over $1.1 million since 2006.
  • Ellison’s campaign currently has a 20:1 fundraising advantage over my campaign. By the end of this campaign he will outspend me by over 1,000%.

Keith routinely sends out fundraising emails claiming that he is under attack and that he needs more of the people’s hard-earned cash to “fight the smears.” You’re supposed to believe that only your money can help him defend his record.

Keith has raised more cash in the last three months than I’ll raise this entire campaign. In fact he has raised and spent more in the last six months than his last two opponents raised during their whole campaigns combined.

So why does Keith Ellison need more money?

Since 2006 Keith has funneled over $400,000 from his campaign war chest to other campaigns and political committees. He has made thousands of dollars in contributions to the campaigns of established incumbents like Barney Frank and Charlie Rangel. This is the kind of legal money-laundering scheme that could only be dreamt up by incumbent politicians who crave power. Tony Soprano would be envious of the scheme that Keith Ellison and his crew have come up with.

It makes you wonder—doesn’t saying you need money for your re-election bid and then giving that money to another candidate in another state kind of make you a bag-man?

If Keith Ellison really wanted to get the money out of politics, he could lead by example and pledge not to raise one more dollar for this campaign- he clearly already has plenty. He could take me up on my offer to hold a debate in every city in the Fifth District, and we could make this a campaign that is focused on the issues people care about most.

But he won’t. Because he can’t win a race on the issues. He can only win this race like he has always done it—with a campaign built on distractions, division, fear, and yes, "big money."

Instead of focusing on the issues and his district, Keith will keep on raising money from “the 1%” and big evil corporations. He'll keep shaking you down for your hard-earned cash and then send that money off to some other state. And while he's doing this his staff will keep writing articles for him about the corrupting influence of money on politics.

He’s just hoping you won’t notice that while he says one thing, he does another.

coyote50 June 15, 2012 at 02:21 am
Rather than attack Keith, why don't you say what you stand for? Keith raises a lot of money because people like me and many many others believe in him and what he has done? What have you done? Common sense? Integrity? Give me a break. What POLICIES do you stand for? I don't care that you're a retired combat veteran or a North Loop resident, I care about your policies. All you've done here is attack Keith. Are you saying you're FOR big money in politics? That's a position, I guess. It's disingenuous to say that Keith hasn't done anything to for job creation. He has a record. What have YOU done.
John June 15, 2012 at 03:13 am
Coyote50, a few things.
1. Chris Fields is ethical, you don't make it 21 years in the Marine Corps by acting unethical. Let's not forget that Keith use to beat his ex wife while she had MS, the guy use to have a pile of unpaid parking tickets, he has links to extremists people and groups. 2. The Progressive Caucus is a group of clowns. What tangible accomplishments have they done? 3. Are you referring to the "People's Budget" or the “Put America to Work Act” or the “Emergency Jobs Now Act” or the “Restore the American Dream for the 99%”? Because guess what, none of these bills went anywhere, along with the 300 other bills Ellison has sponsored or cosponsored. The fact remains, the guy is ineffective, no one except other left wing extremists will work with him. The guy is the very definition of an empty suit. Someone like Chris Fields is at least realistic and practical, ie., he'll put results above rhetoric and party. 4. Open your mind man, you’ve been totally duped by both Ellison and Obama. They promised you everything and delivered nothing. 5. Have you ever met Chris Fields? If not, you should at least talk to the guy, he's not a monster like you imagine him to be. 6. Have a good day.
AKA June 15, 2012 at 04:10 am
So far, both in the comments and the original post itself: a lot of attacks on the incumbent. Yet, ultimately, not a lot said. If you want to be taken seriously by most people...forget about your opponent - tell the voter WHAT YOU'LL DO IF YOU'RE ELECTED. Specifics, not red-white-and-blue flag waving rhetoric - practical, real detailed articulations on what you would intend to accomplish and how you intend to accomplish them. All I've seen so far is that you and your supporters are willing to call names or point fingers. Kind of ironic considering your campaign materials highlight the virtues of "coming together" and rejecting the idea of employing "a message designed to fan the flames of distrust and division for political gain" which you accuse your opponent of using. Please, just stop. Really.
Until then, as someone in the district where you are running as a candidate, I won't take you or your campaign seriously. However, I hope to see some actual detailed information on your plans. As in, NOT your opponent! Is this too much to ask?
coyote50 June 15, 2012 at 01:37 pm
John - the Progressive Caucus can't get anything done because the Republicans have decided that they won't do any kind of stimulus or raise taxes on those who can afford it. Every time we have had a recession, including under Bush and Reagan, we've increased government spending to get out of it. But for some reason, the Republicans would rather keep unemployment high. Hmmm. Wonder why? They would rather keep people out of work instead of using the fiscal tools we have ALWAYS used to get out of recession - providing money to the states to re-build bridges, to fix our water mains - which are breaking at record rates all over the country - look at what just happened in New Jersey, to fix our roads. If we put people back to work, they pay taxes and buy things and businesses have more demand, which means they hire more people. It's not rocket science, but Republicans don't want to do it. They'd rather just rather lay off people in the states and whine about the unemployment rate. I'm just thankful that people like Obama and Keith continue to try to get a job's bill going. The Republicans have continued to obstruct any attempt to improve the economy. What does Chris Fields propose instead of trashing Keith?
coyote50 June 15, 2012 at 01:38 pm
AKA - my sentiments exactly.
Jim Steele June 15, 2012 at 02:32 pm
Wait, the Progressive caucus can't get anything done because of Republicans? Keith, are you posting under the name "coyote50" now? Because it sure sounds like you. The Dems were in complete control of the government from 2008-2010, and they still couldn't pass a budget. The progressive caucus can't get anything done because 1) their values are out of sync with the majority of America and 2) they keep electing clowns and empty suits like Keith Ellison and Raul Grivala who are only good at orchestrating stunts, not legislating.
Chris Fields June 15, 2012 at 02:35 pm
AKA and Coyote50,
I can appreciate your defense of Ellison's record but it does make me question why Keith isn't speaking up. Coyote50, your lack of respect for military service is frankly appalling and if I were Keith Ellison I would be ashamed to call you a supporter. To your points: As a member of a body of legislatures your success in promoting the policies that support the people you represent hinges on your ability to work with other legislatures. Specifically that is where I will excel and where Keith has not. If he had succeeded our district would be in far better shape. It is not enough to stand for things that make the hair on the back of peoples neck tingle. If you can't ever get anything passed then at the end of the day, you let the people down and its time to go. What we need is focused leadership. If elected I can do something that Keith can never ever do, bring Republican votes to common sense ideas even if they come from the left side of the aisle. Finally, I will never shy away from pointing out his record. He doesn't get to stand on a soap box and talk about wonderful things when his record clearly demonstrates the opposite. The people loose when career politicians are not held accountable.
Jim Steele June 15, 2012 at 02:35 pm
AKA, I had questions for Chris Fields so I sent him an email through his website. He responded and we sat down and had coffee. I'm sure he'd do the same for you too.
Jim Steele June 15, 2012 at 02:38 pm
coyote50 - funny you should bring up bridges. Keith Ellison was in office when the 35 W bridge fell. But when the time came to vote to replace the structurally deficient bridge in Stillwater, he was one of the few that voted no. So let's not pretend Keith is a guy who cares about bridges.
coyote50 June 15, 2012 at 02:59 pm
You think that having served in the Armed Forces qualifies you to be our Congressperson? If that's true, then there are thousands of people in our district, including many of my cousins and other relatives who should be in Congress. Sorry Chris, it's not enough. I want to know what you are proposing to do. And I haven't heard it yet. So you attack me because I say that it's not enough to have been in the Armed Forces. Is that leadership? Attacking people who ask you why you are qualified and what your ideas are. So far all you've done is made me think you have nothing to say except to attack Keith. Anyone who worked with Keith in the state legislature and in Congress knows that he will talk to anyone about his ideas and work with them. Maybe you should try talking about your real qualifications and ideas so we can see what you actually have to offer besides attacks on Keith and vague assertions that you can work with people. Who have you worked with and what have you accomplished?
John June 15, 2012 at 04:28 pm
Coyote50, you need to understand the difference between having served in the military vs retiring from the military. Someone that has retired from the military has served 20+ years, and has the same level of skills and professional background as any other professional: lawyer, doctor, professor, business leader, etc. There are many members of congress that retired from the military and then went directly into politics. This is really not an uncommon thing. Speaking of which, many US Presidents went directly from being a career military officer to POTUS.
Also, no one “attacked” you Coyote50. There is clear difference between debating and attacking someone. Sadly it appears you are rather thin-skinned, and have probably not experienced a real confrontation in your life. Furthermore, exposing someones political and legislative record is not an “attack”. If the local news would have said the same thing about Keith’s Million Dollar Machine, would it have also been deemed an “attack” by you? No, it would be considered good journalism, which sadly is something lacking here in the Twin Cities. And finally, do you really think Chris Fields is never going to issue a specific policy position? He already has a few videos and interviews online where he does get more specific. The irony of this is, you probably voted for Barrack Obama, and he was the most vague politician of them all! Hope and Change? Come on, what does that really mean?
Ezra Pound June 15, 2012 at 07:45 pm
I am really tired of reading Chris Fields' diatribes. The visual in my head of him when I have read his website, his blogs, or his comments is of a tiny man standing on a very broad but not high soapbox throwing wild punches at thin air. What a sad image of a Marine. As a resident of the 5th district, I would like to know more specifics about Chris, besides being a retired Marine (which he bleats rather loudly and repeatedly).
1) Where did Chris Fields earn a degree and in what area of interest? 2) I found a previous addresses for Mr Fields in Temecula, CA (he stated before he had a home in San Diego, CA), St Paul, MN (his wife is life long resident of Minneapolis?). So what is the truth and if what you stated was not the complete truth then why lie about seemingly miniscule truths? 3) How long has Mr Fields been wanting to run for office? The motivation to represent the people in 5th district lacks substance considering Mr Fields is not a Minnesotan, a Midwesterner, or for that matter much of a Minneapolis resident. 4) Instead of trying to level the Ellison Campaign funds to the paltry Fields' level, why not work to raise more? 5) Does Mr Fields have better tactics in a political campaign than killing the messenger in hopes of killing the message? What might be refreshing is being genuine, authentic,honest.
John June 15, 2012 at 08:40 pm
It’s amazing that your username is Ezra Pound, who was a professional critic, yet according to you, Chris Fields is prohibited to be critical of Comrade Ellison.  He isn’t allowed to say that he’s a retired Marine?  He spent almost his entire adult life in the Marine Corps, but Ezra Pound forbids him to speak about it? 
Also, your pal Al Franken was also born in New York, and he lived there for most of his adult life, he only moved back to Minnesota in 2005 to run for Senate.  Doesn't Al Franken fail your residency requirement also?  Furthermore, Keith Ellison was born in Detroit and spends most of his time in New York. I’d be surprised if Keith could remember how to get to the North Side without his driver. Keith Ellison is entitled to raise as much money as he legally wants, he’s just a hypocrite because he is waging war on the entire system, while also taking advantage of it.  He can’t have it both ways Mr. Pound.  Furthermore, all the info about where he use to live, and who he is married to, where he went to college, is probably on his website.  And I do know for sure that he lives in Minneapolis, so your investigation fell short.  Maybe you should read his website before making wild claims.  
AKA June 15, 2012 at 11:40 pm
Chris,
Please point me to where I defended anyone's record. In fact, might I point out to you, since you failed to notice, that I didn't even mention him. I mentioned you. For someone who doesn't want this to be about the "politics of division", you're sure quick to lump me in with the group that isn't on board with you. It's laughable that you think that automatically means I'm defending or supporting anyone. I have no problem with you pointing out where your opponent is lacking. However, when that's largely done in place of actually proposing something material and concrete, well, that's when I stop taking your campaign seriously. It's just more of the same - which, for the record, comes from both of the 2 major parties. Someone, wake me up when we've got a candidate that runs on their own ideas, not solely pointing out the failures of everyone else. I'm tired of it. I'm not alone in this regard.
Ezra Pound June 16, 2012 at 01:36 am
Dear John:
1) Never stated that I "forbids him [Mr Fields] to speak about it [Marine Corps Veteran] A really strange and outlandish response to Mr. Fields incessant need to remind all of us of his service in military.Thank you Mr Fields but please move forward from your past. 2) Al Franken is not my pal.I am actually registered as a Republican but do not feel the need to only vote for the party in which I am affiliated. You, however, just brought the point to light about residency requirement and moving to state to run for office. Yes, I do feel that is what Mr Fields has done but thank you, John, to be the first one to connect this dot. 3) I did not question who he is married to. 4) No, there is nothing on his website about where he earned a degree. 5) Great he lives in Minneapolis 5th district I did not question that. I do question the motivation. 6) No wild claims just questions. My questions are valid and are worthy of being answered by Mr Fields himself.
Jim Steele June 16, 2012 at 01:53 am
Ezra Pound - here in MN, we don't register to vote by party affiliation, so you can't technically be a registered Republican.
If someone was going to, as you imply, move somewhere just to run for office, wouldn't they pick an easier place than Minneapolis, where they start 25 points behind?
Ezra Pound June 16, 2012 at 01:57 am
Not if your a meglamaniac. If Mr Fields is one then he would have no qualms about this moving here with this motivations. If he is not one, then he has a lot of information about actual policy, plans, sound ideas that he should share.
Jim Steele June 16, 2012 at 01:57 am
I find the anti-military slant of some of the comments here quite appalling. Maybe it's just me, but I would never tell someone who literally put their life on the line for my freedom that they should "move on", or imply that their service doesn't qualify them to serve in Congress.
I for one would rather see more veterans and fewer lawyers in Congress.
Jim Steele June 16, 2012 at 02:02 am
Got it. Chris Fields is a tiny meglamaniac who bleats about his military service. Keep it classy, buddy.
Please clarify your comment about being registered as a Republican. I mean, if what you stated was not the complete truth then why lie about seemingly miniscule truths?
Brie Shultz June 17, 2012 at 08:49 pm
The only reason Keith Ellison is up with such a large cash advantage is because you're a throw-away candidate. The GOP would be throwing a lot of cash at your campaign if they thought you had a chance, but Ellison is a strong candidate in a liberal area. No offense to you; it cuts both ways, there are several democrat candidates going against strong GOP candidates in conservative areas that also receive little funding/support because they realistically have little chance of winning. *Yawn*
Chowenhouse June 17, 2012 at 10:51 pm
Good point, Brie. My original post June 14 was meant to criticize the blog for running Fields' critical piece about Ellison without pointing out that Fields is running against Keith. The firestorm it set off has given this Fields guy and his stooges more attention than his credentials or status as a Republican placeholder . . . ever merited. 'Nuff said . Let's talk about something or someone who matters.
Jim Steele June 17, 2012 at 11:10 pm
What's awesome is that Chowenhouse and Brie just proved Chris' point for him, but they don't see the irony. Chris has argued that because Keith Ellison is in a "safe district" then he has no accountability. Because he's virtually guaranteed re-election, no matter how poor of a job he does, he doesn't have to perform for his constituents.
It's an odd view of Democracy that has been put forth here. According to team Keith, Chris is a "throw-away candidate" and doesn't merit attention. I get the impression that if it were up to Chowenhouse, et.al, we'd just crown Keith right now and not even bother with an election. Who's job is it to keep Keith accountable for the rest of us? Unlike the astroturfers here, I'm actually a resident of the Fifth, and I am unhappy with my representation in Washington. Why does Keith get to just run unopposed and unchecked? And why, since he's guaranteed a win, does he need a million dollars? This just doesn't make sense.
Chris Fields June 17, 2012 at 11:45 pm
Well this has gotten interesting! Good conversation!! Keep it up! If you didn't catch my press release on this matter, check out my website. Good Comments Jim!
Here are a couple of comments: Brie, If I have little chance of winning then why has Keith Ellison spent over $1 million dollars already? Shouldn't he tell people to send their money directly to all of the other candidates he is required to support according to his treasurer. Or better yet help the poor with their hard earned cash. Why the shell game? Why use me in his fundraising letters to justify raking in more cash that he doesn't need? Chowenhouse, I don't think Keith Ellison shares your point of view. He must think that my credentials and message are substantive because he has chosen not to answer my call for a debate in every city in the District. Given his staffs previous comments and the post by his treasurer they do appear concerned. I get that. Its like I said on the Late Debate with Jack and Ben yesterday. Paul Wellstone had his bus; Keith Ellison has his Gravy Train. Ellison and his people don't want the Gravy Train stopped. You should be encouraging him to debate me. One in every city. I'll focus on real issues and you'll get the info you need to make a good choice.
Ezra Pound June 18, 2012 at 01:27 am
For now, I would just prefer that you answer questions, state a coherent idea, have some substance and merit. Come on, dude - your rhetoric is surface and getting old.
Daniel June 20, 2012 at 01:46 am
Keith Ellison was, is, and always will be a "do as I say not as I do" charlatan. His theatrics in Congress are an embarrassment and only meant to divert attention from the fact that he is incompetent.
Matt June 22, 2012 at 02:34 pm
@Daniel - thanks for the constructive commentary and supporting argument.
Scott Anderson June 23, 2012 at 02:12 am
Thank you, Chris, for answering some of the questions above! Nice to see a candidate in the comments section for a change. And Rep Ellison should absolutely agree to a series of debates. It's ridiculous not to be open to that. That being said, can you please settle two subjects once and for all? 1) when did you move to Minneapolis? And why did you move to Minneapolis? 2) Do you have a college degree, and if so, in what major and from where? Your website as near as I can tell does not provide the answer to either question. Thank you so much.
Daniel June 23, 2012 at 10:39 pm
Are you being sarcastic Matt?
If you are, would you prefer that I list out the numerous cases of Keith Ellison's ignorance, incompetence, and hypocrisy?
Chris Fields June 24, 2012 at 12:24 pm
Scott,
Thank you for your questions. I moved permanently to Minneapolis in April 2011 and was officially retired from the Marines in August of 2011. My wife and I choose to live in Minneapolis for a variety of reasons. The short answer is I am an urban dweller and while San Diego (where I spent most of my military career in the states) is nice, I am a city guy. I graduated Magna Cum Laude with a Degree in Finance from Park University which is located in Kansas. I attended the courses on their Satellite Campus at Camp Pendleton while on active duty. Please feel free to email me anytime.
James Warden (Editor) June 25, 2012 at 07:51 pm
I'd love to hear what the people commenting in this article have to say on this topic:
How Do You Define These Controversial Words? http://hopkins.patch.com/articles/how-do-you-define-these-controversial-words

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Fridley Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Mike B. June 17, 2013 at 03:56 pm
Sad to say, the Minnesota budget will drive more Minnesota families and businesses out of thisRead More state. The Democrat Party has enacted a far-left wing agenda. New business start-ups in Minnesota continue to decline. Why should a business invest in a state with confiscatory taxes? Wisconsin and the Dakotas, with excellent Republican governors are attracting business and top-flight workers, while Minnesota stagnates at best.
Fridley Parks & Recreation June 9, 2013 at 06:56 am
For complete rules on how to participate visit the City's web site:Read More http://ci.fridley.mn.us/images/article-files/parksandrec/49erdays/Fridley_Idol_Rules.pdf
Fridley Parks & Recreation June 9, 2013 at 07:01 am
For rules and detailed information on the contest visit the City's web site:Read More http://ci.fridley.mn.us/49er-days/fridley-idol
Dan Johnson June 12, 2013 at 05:50 pm
Candace. Religious groups currently perform same sex marriages, as they have in the past. RequiringRead More a religious ceremony for a marriage does not solve your problem of same sex marriages. It only denies marriage to non-believers. And would you include every religion? Or just those of which you approve? Same sex marriage is nothing new. Despite your lack of information, same sex couples have been getting married throughout history, and marriage has taken many other forms as well in addition to the 8 types found in the bible. Dire predictions of collapse do not show how treating all persons equally under the law results in the loss of freedom rather than the expansion of it.
Dan Johnson June 12, 2013 at 06:14 pm
Donald. We can agree on liking better, the old format that allows direct replies. Strange youRead More would accuse Mike H. of seeking a utopia, and then describe your childhood experience where all conflicts are successfully resolved by the parties involved, without the help of adult intervention. Most of us lived in a very different reality, where bullies were often tolerated if not encouraged by many adults, and some kids suffer severe harm which results in suicide for more than a few. While I don't support "zero tolerance" laws or policies that expel all kids who are involved in a physical altercation, I support adult intervention in all such events. They should be used to teach civilized conflict resolution, anger management, and assess the need for any other intervention. Kids who bully are often learning it at home through being abused. Did you skip reading "Lord of the Flies"?
Dan Johnson June 12, 2013 at 06:25 pm
I also miss paragraphs.
Dan Johnson June 4, 2013 at 06:10 pm
American Academy of Pediatrics: "The terms reparative therapy and sexual orientation conversionRead More therapy refer to counseling and psychotherapy aimed at eliminating or suppressing homosexuality. The most important fact about these “therapies” is that they are based on a view of homosexuality that has been rejected by all the major mental health professions. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders,6 published by the American Psychiatric Association, which defines the standards of the field, does not include homosexuality. All other major health professional organizations have supported the American Psychiatric Association in its declassification of homosexuality as a mental disorder in 1973. Thus, the idea that homosexuality is a mental disorder or that the emergence of same-sex attraction and orientation among some adolescents is in any way abnormal or mentally unhealthy has no support among any mainstream health and mental health professional organizations. The idea that homosexuality is a mental disorder or that the emergence of same-sex attraction and orientation among some adolescents is in any way abnormal or mentally unhealthy has no support among any mainstream health and mental health professional organizations."
Dan Johnson June 4, 2013 at 06:12 pm
"Despite the general consensus of major medical, health, and mental health professions thatRead More both heterosexuality and homosexuality are normal expressions of human sexuality, efforts to change sexual orientation through therapy have been adopted by some political and religious organizations and aggressively promoted to the public. However, such efforts have serious potential to harm young people because they present the view that the sexual orientation of lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth is a mental illness or disorder, and they often frame the inability to change one’s sexual orientation as a personal and moral failure. Because of the aggressive promotion of efforts to change sexual orientation through therapy, a number of medical, health, and mental health professional organizations have issued public statements about the dangers of this approach. The American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Counseling Association, the American Psychiatric Association, the American Psychological Association, the American School Counselor Association, the National Association of School Psychologists, and the National Association of Social Workers, together representing more than 480,000 mental health professionals, have all taken the position that homosexuality is not a mental disorder and thus is not something that needs to or can be “cured.” The American Academy of Pediatrics advises youth that counseling may be helpful for you if you feel confused about your sexual identity. Avoid any treatments that claim to be able to change a person’s sexual orientation, or treatment ideas that see homosexuality as a sickness." AAP
Dan Johnson June 4, 2013 at 06:31 pm
Ironically, much of the research showing orientation is not a choice, comes from failed efforts toRead More change it. Not only have such efforts shown efforts to change orientation are not successful, but that they are often harmful to the point of self destructive behavior including suicide. "Contrary to claims of sexual orientation change advocates and practitioners, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of psychological interventions to change sexual orientation," said Judith M. Glassgold, PsyD, chair of the task force. "Scientifically rigorous older studies in this area found that sexual orientation was unlikely to change due to efforts designed for this purpose. Contrary to the claims of SOCE practitioners and advocates, recent research studies do not provide evidence of sexual orientation change as the research methods are inadequate to determine the effectiveness of these interventions." Glassgold added: "At most, certain studies suggested that some individuals learned how to ignore or not act on their homosexual attractions. Yet, these studies did not indicate for whom this was possible, how long it lasted or its long-term mental health effects. Also, this result was much less likely to be true for people who started out only attracted to people of the same sex." APA Based on this review, the task force recommended that mental health professionals avoid misrepresenting the efficacy of sexual orientation change efforts when providing assistance to people distressed about their own or others' sexual orientation."
Tom May 31, 2013 at 12:20 pm
As I said earlier " if all goes well we will end the 49er days festival with fireworks onRead More Sunday, June 30th" Unfortunately all did not go well and we will not be able to have the fireworks this year. It takes a lot of donations to run a festival this large, so maybe if we get an early start for next year we will end the 2014 49er Day's Festival with a bang. Also we still could use some volunteers to help at tome of the functions during the festival. If you are able to volunteer, call Tom Bourque at 603-548-3958
David F May 3, 2013 at 03:02 am
We (parents) have created the hyper competitiveness of amateur sports. Pressure on coaches is aboutRead More winning, not too many coaches get fired who win state championships. . The measure that USA Hockey uses to assess the advancement of skill levels of US players is how many reach the NHL. The state legislature is trying to solve a problem even though they cannot define what the problem is.
J Johnson May 9, 2013 at 10:52 pm
The writer of this bill, Dean Urdahl, has gone on the record that NO coach has ever lost his job inRead More Minnesota based only on parent complaints - so why all the fuss and sense of need to do something? What Leah seems to think is the opinion of many parents and she is very wrong. Hasn't everyone read the news reports of coaches who abuse players, who steal from the school district, who are horrible with kids, who choose teams based on which parents will contribute $ to the program? This ILLEGAL behavior routinely happens in practically every school district. This legislation is a shield for bad coaches. Never heard of a good coach, who treats players with respect and who works on skill improvement in positive ways ever being let go. School districts and bad coaches put duct tape over their mouths to avoid the scandal that would result if the community knew what was happening on some high school teams. AD's, principals and school boards already have plenty of policies in place that make it almost impossible to fire employees - why do coaches need more protection than the lunch ladies, custodians, aides, teachers and support staff? The answer is they don't and this whole thing is a ploy to keep the good old boys network of bad coaches in their positions.
Orono May 20, 2013 at 06:06 pm
My son attends a school with the opposite situation. He attends a private school, competion toRead More attract new students can get severe. His school has gotten caught up in the desire to be a player in the sports arena in an effort to gain more students. While I admire the desire to become more competitive, when you dont have enough kids to field a football team, being competitve shouldnt be your first priority. The school has recently gone away from teachers being coaches to hiring outside the school. They recently hired a baseball coach that used to play professionally. When he is not coaching highschool, he runs a baseball academy. He cant live off only his coaching salary. His baseball academy is his bread and butter. It costs about $4000 to attend this academy. Half the academy was made up of his own highschool players. The players that paid the money and attended the academy played all the innings during the highschool season. The school was left with a huge black eye and was forced to replace him. The school has a senior class of only 70 kids (boys and girls) to begin with. It seems the math teacher who used to coach the team didnt have a sexy enough resume to attract outside students. The fiasco caused many average kids who couldnt afford the academy to quit. Now the school has even fewer kids playing and is forced to play underclassmen at the varsity level to fill the roster. Making a bad team even worse.
Russell Jones April 26, 2013 at 03:13 am
I agree with Ms. Powell, the cops have encrypted frequencies they can use that aren't available toRead More scanners. If the cops don't use them it's their mistake. The majority of communication should be allowed since law enforcement is paid for by our tax dollars making it publicly owned. The people have a right to know what their government is doing!
Penny May 18, 2013 at 05:25 am
Explore the latest women's bag collections exclusively available atRead More http://pinterest.com/louisvuittonlv/. Louis Vuitton Spring Summer 2013 Show your fashion style now!
Michael Hindin May 23, 2013 at 04:45 pm
Private channels are often difficult to arrange when you have multiple agencies involved. In thisRead More area there has been much progress in having compatible communication between different emergency responders. Cell phones help when time is not an issue.