It’s a time-honored tradition in Washington—when people are focused on a problem that you don’t want them focused on, create a distraction. Today, people are concerned about job creation, the economy and the national debt. So obviously Keith Ellison is talking about… “”.
I get it. It’s a slick move on his part. Try and focus attention on something that sounds sexy—everyone hates "big money," right?
Keith Ellison knows that he is vulnerable on the issues that really matter, so he wants to create a distraction. He doesn’t want you thinking about the dismal job numbers, or the unemployment gap between whites and minorities in the Fifth District.
I’d rather we focus on the issues that matter to everyday citizens, but let’s indulge Keith for a minute and look at the issue of money in politics by examining the Ellison political campaign money operation.
Here are the facts:
- Keith Ellison has raised and spent over one million dollars so far on this campaign.
- More than 80% of Keith’s money comes from outside of the Fifth Congressional District.
- Political Action Committees, many of which are funded by “big corporations,” have given Keith over $200,000 this election cycle, and over $1.1 million since 2006.
- Ellison’s campaign currently has a 20:1 fundraising advantage over my campaign. By the end of this campaign he will outspend me by over 1,000%.
Keith routinely sends out fundraising emails claiming that he is under attack and that he needs more of the people’s hard-earned cash to “fight the smears.” You’re supposed to believe that only your money can help him defend his record.
Keith has raised more cash in the last three months than I’ll raise this entire campaign. In fact he has raised and spent more in the last six months than his last two opponents raised during their whole campaigns combined.
So why does Keith Ellison need more money?
Since 2006 Keith has funneled over $400,000 from his campaign war chest to other campaigns and political committees. He has made thousands of dollars in contributions to the campaigns of established incumbents like Barney Frank and Charlie Rangel. This is the kind of legal money-laundering scheme that could only be dreamt up by incumbent politicians who crave power. Tony Soprano would be envious of the scheme that Keith Ellison and his crew have come up with.
It makes you wonder—doesn’t saying you need money for your re-election bid and then giving that money to another candidate in another state kind of make you a bag-man?
If Keith Ellison really wanted to get the money out of politics, he could lead by example and pledge not to raise one more dollar for this campaign- he clearly already has plenty. He could take me up on my offer to hold a debate in every city in the Fifth District, and we could make this a campaign that is focused on the issues people care about most.
But he won’t. Because he can’t win a race on the issues. He can only win this race like he has always done it—with a campaign built on distractions, division, fear, and yes, "big money."
Instead of focusing on the issues and his district, Keith will keep on raising money from “the 1%” and big evil corporations. He'll keep shaking you down for your hard-earned cash and then send that money off to some other state. And while he's doing this his staff will keep writing articles for him about the corrupting influence of money on politics.
He’s just hoping you won’t notice that while he says one thing, he does another.
1. Chris Fields is ethical, you don't make it 21 years in the Marine Corps by acting unethical. Let's not forget that Keith use to beat his ex wife while she had MS, the guy use to have a pile of unpaid parking tickets, he has links to extremists people and groups. 2. The Progressive Caucus is a group of clowns. What tangible accomplishments have they done? 3. Are you referring to the "People's Budget" or the “Put America to Work Act” or the “Emergency Jobs Now Act” or the “Restore the American Dream for the 99%”? Because guess what, none of these bills went anywhere, along with the 300 other bills Ellison has sponsored or cosponsored. The fact remains, the guy is ineffective, no one except other left wing extremists will work with him. The guy is the very definition of an empty suit. Someone like Chris Fields is at least realistic and practical, ie., he'll put results above rhetoric and party. 4. Open your mind man, you’ve been totally duped by both Ellison and Obama. They promised you everything and delivered nothing. 5. Have you ever met Chris Fields? If not, you should at least talk to the guy, he's not a monster like you imagine him to be. 6. Have a good day.
Until then, as someone in the district where you are running as a candidate, I won't take you or your campaign seriously. However, I hope to see some actual detailed information on your plans. As in, NOT your opponent! Is this too much to ask?
I can appreciate your defense of Ellison's record but it does make me question why Keith isn't speaking up. Coyote50, your lack of respect for military service is frankly appalling and if I were Keith Ellison I would be ashamed to call you a supporter. To your points: As a member of a body of legislatures your success in promoting the policies that support the people you represent hinges on your ability to work with other legislatures. Specifically that is where I will excel and where Keith has not. If he had succeeded our district would be in far better shape. It is not enough to stand for things that make the hair on the back of peoples neck tingle. If you can't ever get anything passed then at the end of the day, you let the people down and its time to go. What we need is focused leadership. If elected I can do something that Keith can never ever do, bring Republican votes to common sense ideas even if they come from the left side of the aisle. Finally, I will never shy away from pointing out his record. He doesn't get to stand on a soap box and talk about wonderful things when his record clearly demonstrates the opposite. The people loose when career politicians are not held accountable.
Also, no one “attacked” you Coyote50. There is clear difference between debating and attacking someone. Sadly it appears you are rather thin-skinned, and have probably not experienced a real confrontation in your life. Furthermore, exposing someones political and legislative record is not an “attack”. If the local news would have said the same thing about Keith’s Million Dollar Machine, would it have also been deemed an “attack” by you? No, it would be considered good journalism, which sadly is something lacking here in the Twin Cities. And finally, do you really think Chris Fields is never going to issue a specific policy position? He already has a few videos and interviews online where he does get more specific. The irony of this is, you probably voted for Barrack Obama, and he was the most vague politician of them all! Hope and Change? Come on, what does that really mean?
1) Where did Chris Fields earn a degree and in what area of interest? 2) I found a previous addresses for Mr Fields in Temecula, CA (he stated before he had a home in San Diego, CA), St Paul, MN (his wife is life long resident of Minneapolis?). So what is the truth and if what you stated was not the complete truth then why lie about seemingly miniscule truths? 3) How long has Mr Fields been wanting to run for office? The motivation to represent the people in 5th district lacks substance considering Mr Fields is not a Minnesotan, a Midwesterner, or for that matter much of a Minneapolis resident. 4) Instead of trying to level the Ellison Campaign funds to the paltry Fields' level, why not work to raise more? 5) Does Mr Fields have better tactics in a political campaign than killing the messenger in hopes of killing the message? What might be refreshing is being genuine, authentic,honest.
Also, your pal Al Franken was also born in New York, and he lived there for most of his adult life, he only moved back to Minnesota in 2005 to run for Senate. Doesn't Al Franken fail your residency requirement also? Furthermore, Keith Ellison was born in Detroit and spends most of his time in New York. I’d be surprised if Keith could remember how to get to the North Side without his driver. Keith Ellison is entitled to raise as much money as he legally wants, he’s just a hypocrite because he is waging war on the entire system, while also taking advantage of it. He can’t have it both ways Mr. Pound. Furthermore, all the info about where he use to live, and who he is married to, where he went to college, is probably on his website. And I do know for sure that he lives in Minneapolis, so your investigation fell short. Maybe you should read his website before making wild claims.
Please point me to where I defended anyone's record. In fact, might I point out to you, since you failed to notice, that I didn't even mention him. I mentioned you. For someone who doesn't want this to be about the "politics of division", you're sure quick to lump me in with the group that isn't on board with you. It's laughable that you think that automatically means I'm defending or supporting anyone. I have no problem with you pointing out where your opponent is lacking. However, when that's largely done in place of actually proposing something material and concrete, well, that's when I stop taking your campaign seriously. It's just more of the same - which, for the record, comes from both of the 2 major parties. Someone, wake me up when we've got a candidate that runs on their own ideas, not solely pointing out the failures of everyone else. I'm tired of it. I'm not alone in this regard.
1) Never stated that I "forbids him [Mr Fields] to speak about it [Marine Corps Veteran] A really strange and outlandish response to Mr. Fields incessant need to remind all of us of his service in military.Thank you Mr Fields but please move forward from your past. 2) Al Franken is not my pal.I am actually registered as a Republican but do not feel the need to only vote for the party in which I am affiliated. You, however, just brought the point to light about residency requirement and moving to state to run for office. Yes, I do feel that is what Mr Fields has done but thank you, John, to be the first one to connect this dot. 3) I did not question who he is married to. 4) No, there is nothing on his website about where he earned a degree. 5) Great he lives in Minneapolis 5th district I did not question that. I do question the motivation. 6) No wild claims just questions. My questions are valid and are worthy of being answered by Mr Fields himself.
If someone was going to, as you imply, move somewhere just to run for office, wouldn't they pick an easier place than Minneapolis, where they start 25 points behind?
I for one would rather see more veterans and fewer lawyers in Congress.
Please clarify your comment about being registered as a Republican. I mean, if what you stated was not the complete truth then why lie about seemingly miniscule truths?
It's an odd view of Democracy that has been put forth here. According to team Keith, Chris is a "throw-away candidate" and doesn't merit attention. I get the impression that if it were up to Chowenhouse, et.al, we'd just crown Keith right now and not even bother with an election. Who's job is it to keep Keith accountable for the rest of us? Unlike the astroturfers here, I'm actually a resident of the Fifth, and I am unhappy with my representation in Washington. Why does Keith get to just run unopposed and unchecked? And why, since he's guaranteed a win, does he need a million dollars? This just doesn't make sense.
Here are a couple of comments: Brie, If I have little chance of winning then why has Keith Ellison spent over $1 million dollars already? Shouldn't he tell people to send their money directly to all of the other candidates he is required to support according to his treasurer. Or better yet help the poor with their hard earned cash. Why the shell game? Why use me in his fundraising letters to justify raking in more cash that he doesn't need? Chowenhouse, I don't think Keith Ellison shares your point of view. He must think that my credentials and message are substantive because he has chosen not to answer my call for a debate in every city in the District. Given his staffs previous comments and the post by his treasurer they do appear concerned. I get that. Its like I said on the Late Debate with Jack and Ben yesterday. Paul Wellstone had his bus; Keith Ellison has his Gravy Train. Ellison and his people don't want the Gravy Train stopped. You should be encouraging him to debate me. One in every city. I'll focus on real issues and you'll get the info you need to make a good choice.
If you are, would you prefer that I list out the numerous cases of Keith Ellison's ignorance, incompetence, and hypocrisy?
Thank you for your questions. I moved permanently to Minneapolis in April 2011 and was officially retired from the Marines in August of 2011. My wife and I choose to live in Minneapolis for a variety of reasons. The short answer is I am an urban dweller and while San Diego (where I spent most of my military career in the states) is nice, I am a city guy. I graduated Magna Cum Laude with a Degree in Finance from Park University which is located in Kansas. I attended the courses on their Satellite Campus at Camp Pendleton while on active duty. Please feel free to email me anytime.
How Do You Define These Controversial Words? http://hopkins.patch.com/articles/how-do-you-define-these-controversial-words