patching...
Breaking: Report: Medtronic Lays Off 500 in Minnesota »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Fridley Resident's Allergies Prompt MN Bill to Ban Onstage Smoking

Goodwin: Actors would only use artificial cigarettes in theater productions.

 

Updated below. The strong reaction of a resident in Fridley to cigarette smoke has led to a bill in the Minnesota Senate that would ban smoking in theatrical productions.

Sen. Barb Goodwin (DFL-50), who represents western and southern Fridley, introduced legislation Thursday to add "theaters" to the list of public places where smoking is unlawful in Minnesota.

The current state smoking ban gave an exclusion to theaters, Goodwin said, to allow for performances in which actors light up cigars or cigarettes.

Strong Reaction
"But we have a resident in Fridley who is very allergic to smoke," Goodwin said: Cigarettes bother her when she helps with theater productions behind the scenes or when she in in the audience.

"When she sits in the front row she has a strong reaction," Goodwin said.

Goodwin is chief author of the bill to remove the exclusion for theater productions. Sens. John Marty (DFL-Roseville) and Becky Sheran (DFL-Mankato) are co-authors.

"They can use artificial cigars and cigarettes," she said.

Rather Switch than Fight
That may not be much of a hardship, according to people in the local theater scene.

"A lot of theaters have already switched" to artificial cigarettes, according to Sheila Regan, a Minneapolis-based actor who also regularly writes about theater for the Twin Cities Daily Planet.

However, Regan (who has also written articles for Fridley Patch) noted that a performance Thursday at the Walker Art Center included a stageful of actors smoking. (See update below.)

Smoking onstage at community or school theater productions that take place on school stages is already prohibited, said Courtney Jahnke, who works behind the scenes at Mounds View Community Theater.

As for artificial cigarettes, a theater's "prop mistress or master [should] know where to get them," according to Jahnke.

Not Reviving Battle
Goodwin said her bill has nothing to do with a bar owner's attempt to exploit the exclusion in the smoking ban for theatrical productions.

Tom Marinaro, owner of Tank's Bar in Babbitt, MN, had outfitted patrons with "ACTOR" badges for "theater nights" on which they flouted the state ban.

But in 2009, a state Court of Appeals panel upheld a lower court's ruling that "theater nights" at bars violated state law. (Read the appeals court's ruling here.)

Could Goodwin's bill bring back past battles from when the Legislature banned smoking in public places? That's not Goodwin's intention either, she said, and she'd rather withdraw it instead.

If "people try to attach all kind of other stuff" to her legislation, she said, "then I'll just pull the bill."

Update (9:30 a.m. Friday): Philip Bither, performing-arts curator at the Walker Art Center, offered this response to Goodwin's bill:

I think it is a bad idea. It limits the range of expression that creators of theater have at their disposal. I understand why someone allergic or concerned about second-hand smoke may choose not to work on or attend a show that has some smoking from the stage, but to ban it altogether is an over-reaction.

  • Should Minnesota ban onstage smoking?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • Yes—only allow artificial cigarettes and cigars.
        15 (46%)
    • No—let actors smoke the real thing.
        17 (53%)
    Total votes: 32
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: Allergies, Artificial Cigarettes, Barb Goodwin, Minnesota Senate, Smoking, and theaters
Would you like to see Goodwin's bill become law? Tell us in the comments.

Fabuladico

9:55 pm on Saturday, January 28, 2012

Realism is always good in an acting role. So if actors can use real cigarettes and cigars if the role calls for it, what happens if they do a stage adaptation of "The Man With the Golden Arm"? Does the actor use real heroin? What about "Hair" Real pot? Hey maybe if doing a murder mystery they can use real guns! Al facetiousness aside, I think or at least hope the audience is smart enough to undertand a play that doesn't resort to giving them lung cancer for effect, and should hope that the actors involed are talented enough to act around a prop.

Reply

Joan

3:11 pm on Thursday, February 28, 2013

I completely agree. And to exclude people with allergies from theater productions is a shame in a state that has been a leader with the MN Disabilities Act. Let everyone enjoy theater productions.

Reply

Fabuladico

4:25 pm on Thursday, February 28, 2013

I myself have a strong allergy to cigarette smoke, and I think having to head for an urgent care because I wanted to see a play is simply preposterous. If a person cannot smoke within 50 feet of the entrance to the theater, why should people be allowed to smoke inside the building?

Reply

Leave a comment